Loading…

Durand v. Carrington — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Durand v. Carrington

1 Root 355 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jan 15, 1792

Full text

Durand v. Carrington

Judgment — Reply sufficient — for that the second writ is not for vexation; but to secure the plaintiff’s debt.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 6732290

Citations

1 Root 355

Cited by

Halpern v. Board of Education
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 16, 1985
Wilson v. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia · Apr 3, 1902
Glasser, Kuder & Ottensoser v. Hackett
Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 15, 1896
Gamsby v. Ray
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Dec 15, 1872
Quinebaug Bank v. Tarbox
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 15, 1850

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service