Eaton v. Peck

Per Curiam. We find no error in this record. The first objection [60] taken, is disposed of by tbe case of Arnold v. Nye, 23 Mich., 286; and the second to onr comprehension, raises only a question of identity of the persons to whom the commission was issued and those who executed it, which, we think, is settled by the return. Judgment affirmed, with costs.