Opinion

Security 1st Nat'l Bank v. Progressive

30 F.3d 1491 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 18, 1994

Full text

30 F.3d 1491 Security 1st Nat'l Bank v. Progressive* NO. 93-05502 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 18, 1994 [1] Appeal From: W.D.La. [2] AFFIRMED. Footnotes [-s] * Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 675429

Citations

30 F.3d 1491
1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20524

Cited by

Odoms v. Geovera Specialty Insurance Company
E.D. Louisiana · Nov 14, 2019
GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company v. Odoms
E.D. Louisiana · Nov 14, 2019

Parentheticals

largely because insurance application was signed by insured, court rejected insured’s argument that intent to deceive was not established where insurance agent had completed application containing false statements
Odoms v. Geovera Specialty Insurance Company
largely because insurance application was signed by insured, court rejected insured’s argument that intent to deceive was not established where insurance agent had completed application containing false statements
GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company v. Odoms