“lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”
Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Nephro-Tech, Inc.
“lapse on the part of an examiner does not exculpate an applicant whose acts are intentionally deceptive”
McGinley v. Franklin Sports, Inc.
insufficient that prior art discloses components of patented device, either separately or in other combinations; “there must be some teaching, suggestion, or incentive to make the combination made by the inventor.”
Aero Industries, Inc. v. John Donovan Enterprises-Florida, Inc.
use of defendant's products was undisputed
Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass