Loading…

Gulf States Steel, Inc. v. LTV Corp. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Gulf States Steel, Inc. v. LTV Corp.

506 U.S. 1022 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 7, 1992

Full text

GULF STATES STEEL, INC. OF ALABAMA v. LTV CORPORATION

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 6803234

Citations

506 U.S. 1022
121 L. Ed. 2d 586
113 S. Ct. 661
61 U.S.L.W. 3418
35 ERC (BNA) 2080
1992 U.S. LEXIS 7733

Cited by

Whitney v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court · Oct 21, 2004
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Georgetown University
D.C. Circuit · Oct 31, 2003
Kiska Const Corp v. WMATA
D.C. Circuit · Mar 11, 2003
KiSKA Construction Corp., U.S.A. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
D.C. Circuit · Mar 11, 2003
Collier v. Clayton County Community Service Board
N.D. Georgia · Sep 30, 2002
Audio Investments v. Robertson
D. South Carolina · Apr 19, 2002
Morris v. Wallace Community College-Selma
S.D. Alabama · Jan 8, 2001
Powers v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

S.D. Alabama · Jul 5, 2000

M.D. Alabama · Aug 4, 1999

French v. Georgia Department of Revenue (In Re ABEPP Acquisition Corp.)

Sixth Circuit · Dec 30, 1997

Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United States

S.D. Florida · Aug 1, 1997

Sanders v. Yellowstone County

Montana Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1996

Parentheticals

"Interpretation of the plain language of a contract is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court."
Kiska Const Corp v. WMATA
“Interpretation of the plain language of a contract is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court.”
KiSKA Construction Corp., U.S.A. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority