Sparrow v. Trustees of Davidson College

Rodman, J. The word “or” in ch. 63-, § 54, of Bat. Rev, evidently should be read “and.” It is probably a mere misprint. If a defendant be personally served with a Justice’s warrant he has notice of the action and is bound to take notice of the judgment if one be taken against him. McDaniel v. Watkins, 76 N. C. 399, is therefore in point. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.