Opinion

State v. Dula

312 N.C. 80 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 2, 1984

Full text

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PRINCESS OHEEDA DULA

PER CURIAM. The Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court did not commit error when it required the defendant to make restitution for the loss and damage caused by the defendant “arising out of’ the offense committed by her as provided by G.S. 15A-1343(d). The decision of the Court of Appeals is Affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 6819872

Citations

312 N.C. 80
1984 N.C. LEXIS 1773
320 S.E.2d 405

Cited by

State v. Murphy
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 21, 2018
Commonwealth v. Palmer P.
Massachusetts Appeals Court · May 25, 2004
Moore v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Mar 27, 1996
State v. Froneberger
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 1986

Parentheticals

acquitted of larceny, but loss was “caused by and arose out of” breaking and entering
Commonwealth v. Palmer P.
"The Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court did not commit error when it required the defendant to make restitution for the loss and damage caused by the defendant 'arising out of' the offense committed by her ...."
State v. Murphy
“The Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court did not commit error when it required the defendant to make restitution for the loss and damage caused by the defendant ‘arising out of’ the offense committed by her . . . .”
State v. Murphy
"The Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court did not commit error when it required the defendant to make restitution for the loss and damage caused by the defendant 'arising out of' the offense committed by her as provided by G.S. 15A-1343(d)."
State v. Murphy
“The Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court did not commit error when it required the defendant to make restitution for the loss and damage caused by the defendant ‘arising out of’ the offense committed by her as provided by G.S. 15A-1343(d).”
State v. Murphy