Loading…

State v. Vanstory — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Vanstory

320 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1987

Full text

STATE v. VANSTORY

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 July 1987.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 6821685

Citations

320 N.C. 176
358 S.E.2d 67

Cited by

State v. Cook
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 2016
State v. Martinez
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2011
State v. Giddens
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2009
State v. Lender
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 2007
In re R.L.C.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 2006
State v. Marine
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1999
State v. Brewington
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1996
State v. Dammons
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1995
State v. Hannon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1995
State v. Farlow

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 17, 1994

State v. Austin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 1993

State v. Farlow

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 1993

Parentheticals

holding that expert’s opinion that she believed the witness and explanation of why she believed witness was inadmissible
State v. Hannon
age of the victim cannot be considered in sentencing for first degree rape because age is an element of the crime
State v. Farlow
The weight to be given aggravating and mitigating factors is clearly within the sound discretion of the trial judge, whose decision will not be disturbed absent an abuse of that discretion.
State v. Lender