concluding that testimony regarding “[the] defendant’s drug addiction was improper under Rule 608(b) because extrinsic evidence of drug addiction, standing alone, is not probative of [a] defendant’s character for truthfulness or untruthfulness”
State v. Harris
cross-examination concerning drug addiction standing alone not probative of defendant's character for truthfulness or untruthfulness
State v. Clark
cross-examination concerning drug addiction standing alone not probative of defendant’s character for truthfulness or untruthfulness
State v. Clark
