Opinion

Taylor v. Brinkman

333 N.C. 795 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1993

Full text

TAYLOR v. BRINKMAN

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 June 1993.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Citations

Cited by

Babb v. Hoskins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2012
Decker v. Homes, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2009
Taylor v. Brinkman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1995
North River Insurance v. Young
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1995
Franklin v. Winn Dixie Raleigh, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1994
Moose v. Nissan of Statesville, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1994
Gunter v. Anders
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1994
Hartman v. Walkertown Shopping Center, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1994

Parentheticals

trial court's order creating possibility of inconsistent verdicts involving identical issues of fact affects a substantial right
Decker v. Homes, Inc.
"... service of process attempted by registered or certified mail, as permitted by N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 4(j)(1)(c), is `complete on the day the summons and complaint are delivered to the address thereon'" (quoting Lynch v. Lynch 303 N.C. 367, 370, 279 S.E.2d 840, 843 (1981)
Franklin v. Winn Dixie Raleigh, Inc.
“. . . service of process attempted by registered or certified mail, as permitted by N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 4(j)(1)(c), is ‘complete on the day the summons and complaint are delivered to the address thereon’ ” (quoting Lynch v. Lynch, 303 N.C. 367, 370, 279 S.E.2d 840, 843 (1981)
Franklin v. Winn Dixie Raleigh, Inc.