Loading…

Williams v. Holsclaw — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Williams v. Holsclaw

349 N.C. 225 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1998

Full text

MICHAEL ANTHONY WILLIAMS and KATHERINE WILLIAMS v. RONALD FLOYD HOLSCLAW and CITY OF RALEIGH

Opinions in this case

Opinion — Per curiam
Majority

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Justice Wynn did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Consideration, Wynn
Cluster ID: 6827404

Citations

349 N.C. 225
1998 N.C. LEXIS 560
504 S.E.2d 784

Cited by

Arrington v. City of Raleigh
Fourth Circuit · Mar 5, 2010
Stegenga v. Burney
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 2006
Stegenga v. Burney
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 2005
Childs v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2002
Clayton v. Branson

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 2002

Schlossberg v. Goins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 29, 2000

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 2000

Polaroid Corp. v. Offerman

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1998

Parentheticals

court focused on the fact that the officer was performing his official police duties when he was responding to a call at the time of the collision
Childs v. Johnson