Loading…

State v. Hughes — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Hughes

351 N.C. 644 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 2000

Full text

STATE v. HUGHES

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 May 2000.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 6828617

Citations

351 N.C. 644
543 S.E.2d 878

Cited by

State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 2011
State v. Aleem
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 2009
Johnson v. Outlaw
M.D. North Carolina · Oct 1, 2009
State v. Koonce
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 2009
State v. Chance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 2009
State v. Ford
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 3, 2009
State v. Corbett
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2008
State v. Talley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2007
State v. McGee
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 2006
State v. Singletary

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 2004

State v. Wiggins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2003

State v. Sellers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2002

Parentheticals

resentencing required when trial court imposed sixty months’ supervised probation on a felon sentenced to intermediate punishment without finding that the extended period of probation was necessary
State v. Lambert
“[ijt is error for an aggravating factor to be based on circumstances which are part of the essence of a crime”
State v. Holt
guilty plea “waives all defenses other than the sufficiency of the indictment”
Johnson v. Outlaw