Loading…

Howard, Stallings, From & Hutson, P.A. v. Douglas — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Howard, Stallings, From & Hutson, P.A. v. Douglas

354 N.C. 346 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 2001

Full text

HOWARD, STALLINGS, FROM & HUTSON, P.A. v. FRANK DOUGLAS

PER CURIAM. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Timmons-Goodson. REVERSED.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 6829389

Citations

354 N.C. 346
2001 N.C. LEXIS 1085
553 S.E.2d 680

Cited by

Salem Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Fazekas
Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 2023
EB HARRIS, INC. v. Wiggins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 20, 2010

Parentheticals

where the appellate judges agreed an appearance in an action cannot be made prior to the filing of a complaint and the Supreme Court adopted the dissenting appellate judge’s extension of this principle to a post-complaint but pre-service letter failing to mention the action
Salem Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Fazekas

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service