Loading…

State v. Mark — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Mark

357 N.C. 242 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 2003

Full text

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PAUL WILLIAM MARK, SR.

Opinions in this case

Opinion — Per curiam
Majority

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 6830483

Citations

357 N.C. 242
2003 N.C. LEXIS 598
580 S.E.2d 693

Cited by

State v. Teesateskie
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 2021
State v. Eldred
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 2018
State v. Lindsey
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 2016
State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 2015
State v. Woods
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 17, 2015
State v. Scruggs

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2014

State v. Hopper

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2010

State v. Fuller

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 2006

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2005

State v. Tedder

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2005

State v. Carver

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 1, 2005

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 2004

Parentheticals

“The opinion of a law enforcement officer . . . has consistently been held sufficient evidence of impairment. . . .”
State v. Wood
"The opinion of a law enforcement officer . . . has consistently been held sufficient evidence of impairment.. . ."
State v. Taylor
“The opinion of a law enforcement officer . . . has consistently been held sufficient evidence of impairment....”
State v. Taylor
"The opinion of a law enforcement officer ... has consistently been held sufficient evidence of impairment."
State v. Fuller
“The opinion of a law enforcement officer . . . has consistently been held sufficient evidence of impairment.”
State v. Fuller