Opinion

Stockum v. State

106 Ohio St. 249 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1922

Full text

Roy Stockum v. State of Ohio

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority — Clark
Majority — Clark

CLARK, J.: 1. The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States does not control nor is it a limitation upon the criminal procedure -of the several states. (Prescott v. State, 19 Ohio St., 184, approved and followed.) 2. Imprisonment “at hard labor” of a person convicted of an offense under Section 1654, General Code, is lawful and does not violate any provision of the federal or state constitution. Judgment affirmed. Marshall, C. J., Hough, Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1935

Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel.

Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1933

Municipal Court v. State ex rel. Platter

Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1933

State v. Kassay

Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1932

Stewart v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1932

Ingham v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1929

Sheward v. State

Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1927

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.