State v. Gobal

Parentheticals

• "Statements elicited by a defendant on cross-examination are, even if error, invited error, by which a defendant cannot be prejudiced as a matter of law."

  State v. Hester

• “Statements elicited by a defendant on cross- examination are, even if error, invited error, by which a defendant cannot be prejudiced as a matter of law.”

  State v. Hester

• “[O]ur Supreme Court has determined that when one witness vouch[es] for the veracity of another witness, such testimony is an opinion which is not helpful to the jury's determination of a fact in issue and is therefore excluded.” (alterations in original) (cleaned up)

  State v. Warden