In re H.N.D.

PER-CURIAM. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. REVERSED. — 598 — PENNY CUMMINGS v. AGNES ORTEGA, M.D. and WOMEN’S HEALTH CARE SPECIALISTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER No. 417P10 The defendant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed on the following issue only: “Did the trial court err by relying on evidence contained within juror affidavits to grant plaintiff a new trial?” By order of the Court in Conference, this 15th day of December, 2010. Hudson. J. For the Court — 599 — [[Image here]] — 600 — [[Image here]] — 601 — [[Image here]] — 602 — [[Image here]] — 603 — [[Image here]] — 604 — [[Image here]] — 605 — [[Image here]] — 606 — [[Image here]] — 607 — [[Image here]] — 608 — [[Image here]] — 609 — [[Image here]] — 610 — [[Image here]] — 611 — [[Image here]] — 612 — [[Image here]] — 613 — [[Image here]] — 614 — [[Image here]] — 615 — [[Image here]] — 616 — [[Image here]] — 617 — [[Image here]] — 618 — [[Image here]] — 619 — [[Image here]] — 620 — [[Image here]] — 621 — [[Image here]] — 622 — [[Image here]]