Loading…

United States v. Asprilla — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

United States v. Asprilla

42 F.3d 640 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 30, 1994

Full text

United States v. Asprilla

42 F.3d 640 U.S. v. Asprilla* NO. 94-30150 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Nov 30, 1994 [1] Appeal From: E.D.La., No. CRIM # 92-345-L-L-M [2] AFFIRMED.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 684152

Citations

42 F.3d 640
1994 WL 708804

Cited by

Seismic Wells, L.L.C. v. Sinclair Companies
Fifth Circuit · Aug 31, 2018

Parentheticals

holding the error is harmless where, assuming a district court incorrectly grants a party’s motion to supplement the record, this court does not consider the documents
Seismic Wells, L.L.C. v. Sinclair Companies

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service