Opinion

State ex rel. Prayner v. Industrial Commission

31 Ohio Op. 2d 192 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1965

Full text

The State, ex rel. Prayner v. Industrial Commission of Ohio

Per Curiam. The Industrial Commission has control over its orders until the actual institution of an appeal therefrom or until the expiration of the time for such an appeal. See Diltz v. Crouch, Dir. of Liquor Control, 173 Ohio St. 367. Judgment affirmed. Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider, and Brown, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman
Cluster ID: 6863776

Citations

31 Ohio Op. 2d 192
1965 Ohio LEXIS 500
2 Ohio St. 2d 120
206 N.E.2d 911

Cited by

State ex rel. Neitzelt v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 15, 2020
State ex rel. Neitzelt v. Indus. Comm.
Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2019
Palmer Bros. Concrete v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio, 13-07-16 (2-4-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 2008
State Ex. Rel. Columbus F.A.A. v. Dixon, Unpublished Decision (1-27-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2005
Hand v. Bureau of Workers', Unpublished Decision (3-28-2003)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2003
Williams v. Truck Bus Div. of G.M.C., Unpublished Decision (11-9-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2000