Opinion

State v. Zuranski

32 Ohio St. 3d 379 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1987

Full text

The State of Ohio v. Zuranski

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Holmes

This cause (court of appeals No. 50447) is allowed as to Proposition of Law No. XV only, and as so allowed is reversed on authority of State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744, and remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with that decision. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.