Opinion

State ex rel. Rhodes v. Van Brocklin

36 Ohio St. 3d 236 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 11, 1988

Full text

The State, ex rel. Rhodes v. Van Brocklin

On the basis that appellant has an adequate remedy at law, the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint in mandamus (case No. 87 CA 176) is affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
Cluster ID: 6868667

Citations

36 Ohio St. 3d 236
1988 Ohio LEXIS 128
522 N.E.2d 1088

Cited by

State Ex Rel. MacKey v. Blackwell, Unpublished Decision (12-22-2004)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2004
State Ex Rel. Haynes v. Sutula, Unpublished Decision (11-5-2004)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 2004
State Ex Rel Nash v. Cleveland Police Dept, Unpublished Decision (8-17-2004)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 2004
Cooper v. State, Unpublished Decision (8-8-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2002
State v. Kittrell, Unpublished Decision (6-28-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 2002
State v. Court of Common Pleas, Unpublished Decision (6-27-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2001

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.