Opinion

F.D.I.C. v. Stringer

46 F.3d 66 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 13, 1995

Full text

46 F.3d 66 F.D.I.C. v. Stringer* NO. 94-10668 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Jan 13, 1995 Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 3:93-CV-994-X [1] AFFIRMED. Footnotes [-s] * Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 687440

Citations

46 F.3d 66
1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1895
1995 WL 29283

Cited by

United States v. Cash
Fifth Circuit · Aug 8, 2025
Cynthia Heinsohn v. Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
Fifth Circuit · Aug 9, 2016
Cynthia Heinsohn v. Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
Fifth Circuit · Jul 29, 2016
Cynthia Heinsohn v. Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
Fifth Circuit · Jul 26, 2016

Parentheticals

"The Advisory Committee Notes to [Rule] 1002 provide that "an event may be proved by nondocumentary evidence, even though a written record of it was made.”
Cynthia Heinsohn v. Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
“The Advisory Committee Notes to [Rule] 1002 provide that “an event may be proved by nondocumentary evidence, even though a written record of it was made.”
Cynthia Heinsohn v. Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
“The Advisory Committee Notes to [Rule] 1002 provide that “an event may be proved by nondocumentary evidence, even though a written record of it was made.”
Cynthia Heinsohn v. Carabin & Shaw, P.C.