Opinion

State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann

67 Ohio St. 3d 443 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1993

Full text

The State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann

Per Curiam. We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. The trial court has ordered the relief appellant seeks. If he is dissatisfied, he may appeal. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 40 O.O.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, paragraph three of the syllabus. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cluster ID: 6876125

Citations

67 Ohio St. 3d 443
619 N.E.2d 692

Cited by

State ex rel. Steinle v. Dewey
Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 2015
State Ex Rel. McDonald v. Mitrovich, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2006)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 2006
State Ex Rel. Cunningham v. Lucci, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2006)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 2006
State Ex Rel. Newberry v. O'neill, Unpublished Decision (9-1-2004)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2004
State v. Russo, Unpublished Decision (12-5-2003)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 2003
State Ex Rel. Law v. Friedman, Unpublished Decision (11-14-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2002