Loading…

State ex rel. McKinney v. Wilkinson — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State ex rel. McKinney v. Wilkinson

69 Ohio St. 3d 1422 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1994

Full text

State ex rel. McKinney v. Wilkinson

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. On motion to amend complaint. Motion denied. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cluster ID: 6877207

Citations

69 Ohio St. 3d 1422
1994 Ohio LEXIS 907
631 N.E.2d 162

Cited by

Lewis v. Clark Equip. Co., Unpublished Decision (12-14-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 2001
State ex rel. McKinney v. Wilkinson
Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1994

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service