Opinion

In re Kapel

72 Ohio St. 3d 532 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1995

Full text

In re Application of Kapel

Per Curiam. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree that Kevin M. Kapel has not sufficiently demonstrated his present character and fitness for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. We also concur in the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, Kapel’s pending applications to take the Ohio Bar Examination are disapproved, and he may not reapply until necessary for the February 1996 Bar examination. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cluster ID: 6878996

Citations

72 Ohio St. 3d 532
1995 Ohio LEXIS 2492
651 N.E.2d 955

Cited by

In re Application of Daubenmire
Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2024
In Re Application of Mikulin
Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 2016
In re Application of Corrigan
Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 26, 2009
In re Conrad
Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2006
In re Dickens
Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2005
In re Application of Kapel
Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1999

Parentheticals

finding that the applicant’s disorderly conduct conviction and repeated traffic violations, including speeding, demonstrated that the applicant lacked the requisite character and fitness for the practice of law but permitting the applicant to reapply
In Re Application of Mikulin
applicant’s disorderly- conduct conviction and sustained pattern of disregarding traffic laws demonstrated that he lacked the requisite character and fitness to practice law
In re Application of Daubenmire