Loading…

State v. Midlam — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Midlam

135 Ohio St. 3d 1411 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2013

Full text

State v. Midlam

Greene App. No. 2012 CA 25, 2012-Ohio-5539. On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied. Lanzinger and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Lanzinger, Neill
Cluster ID: 6901826

Citations

135 Ohio St. 3d 1411
986 N.E.2d 28

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service