Loading…

State v. Arnold — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Arnold

138 Ohio St. 3d 1492 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 14, 2014

Full text

State v. Arnold

Meigs App. No. 11CA21, 2014-Ohio-264. On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer
Cluster ID: 6903150

Citations

138 Ohio St. 3d 1492
8 N.E.3d 963

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service