Scalione v. Heimann

ROBB, Associate Justice. This interfer- ence involves the same applications of the parties Scalione and Heimann that were involved in Patent Appeal No. 1824, — App. D. C. — , 12 F.(2d) 171, just decided. Heimann relies upon his German application, as did the party Bosch in patent appeal No. 1824. Since the rulings in that case are applicable here, the facts being substantially the same, the decision is affirmed. Affirmed.