United States v. Cleveland Campbell

52 F.3d 1123 311 U.S.App.D.C. 278 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. UNITED STATES of America v. Cleveland CAMPBELL, Appellant. No. 93-3080. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. March 20, 1995. Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge; SILBERMAN and BUCKLEY, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. [1] This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is [2] ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that appellant's conviction be affirmed. First, the evidence was sufficient to support Campbell's conviction. See United States v. Washington, 12 F.3d 1128, 1135-36 (D.C.Cir.1994). Second, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a mistrial. See United States v. Burroughs, 935 F.2d 292, 295 (D.C.Cir.1991). [3] The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 41.