Loading…

Gordon v. Kleckner — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Gordon v. Kleckner

131 F.2d 863 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 27, 1942

Full text

Philip GORDON v. Thaddeus B. KLECKNER

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed on the opinion below, In re Gordon, 44 F.Supp. 581.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 6987510

Citations

131 F.2d 863
1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2975

Cited by

In the Matter of Patton Manufacturing Company, Debtor. The First National Bank of Cincinnati, Caribbean Container Company, Thechatfield Paper Corporation, Chemineer, Inc., Joseph G. Donohoo, the Meadcorporation, Smith & Schnacke, and Touche, Ross, Bailey & Smart v. Everett W. Kimberling, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Patton Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt, Patton Manufacturing Company, G.L.P., Inc., Patton Manufacturing Company,inc., and Juno, Inc. (The Corporate Name Now Changed to One Um, Inc.),plaintiffs-Appellants v. Everett W. Kimberling, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Patton Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt
First Circuit · Jul 1, 1969
First National Bank v. Kimberling
Sixth Circuit · Jul 1, 1969
In re WNCN, Inc.
S.D. New York · Jul 21, 1965

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service