United States v. Wilson

162 F.2d 712 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 14, 1947

Full text

United States v. George C. WILSON SAME v. Thomas M. LIVERGOOD SAME v. Louis L. NICOLAI SAME v. Vasta L. McCORMICK, Administratrix, etc. SAME v. Ella TREISCH SAME v. J. Karl MUSCHANY SAME v. Theodore LAMMERT SAME v. John Henry DIECKMANN SAME v. Iva Awbrey FOX SAME v. T. M. LIVERGOOD SAME v. Caroline L. UTLANT, etc. SAME v. Lillian H. HAYS, etc. SAME v. Morris MUSCHANY SAME v. Calvin Dwight CASTLIO SAME v. Patrick SWEENEY, etc. SAME v. Calvin CASTLIO SAME v. Morris I. MUSCHANY SAME v. Edward H. SCHNEIDER SAME v. B. O. MAHAFFEY SAME v. Chiles F. STEWART, etc. SAME v. Birch O. MAHAFFEY, Trustee, etc. SAME v. Mertia CALLAWAY SAME v. Nell L. FULKERSON SAME v. Leonard J. KESSLER SAME v. Earl M. MILLER, Administrator, etc. SAME v. Walker CUNNINGHAM SAME v. Chiles F. STEWART SAME v. Samuel M. WATSON SAME v. Clyde KEISER, Individually, etc. SAME v. George Wesley STEVENSON SAME v. Julius L. ZELLER SAME v. Agnes KOLODZEY SAME v. Fred G. MOUND SAME v. Daniel R. MacDONALD

PER CURIAM. On motion of appellant, judgment of District Court reversed and cause remanded to District Court with instructions to enter judgment in the amount of the McDowell Option Contract without interest, on authority of decision of Supreme Court of the United States of February 3, 1947, 67 S.Ct. 606, in the cases of Albrecht v. United States (Q. W. S. S. Realty & Investment Co. v. United States, Linnen-bringer et al. v. United States, Pitman et al. v. United States), 155 F.2d 77; 61 F. Supp. 199, and Oliver v. United States, 155 F.2d 73; 60 F.Supp. 741, holding that the landowners were not entitled to interest in addition to amount under McDowell Option Contract.