Loading…

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

National Metropolitan Bank v. Stoner

177 F.2d 37 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1949

Full text

The NATIONAL METROPOLITAN BANK OF WASHINGTON v. STONER

Opinions in this case

Majority
On rehearing

PER CURIAM. We find no prejudicial error in the record. The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Edgerton, Ford, Proctor
Cluster ID: 7004716

Citations

177 F.2d 37
85 U.S. App. D.C. 157
1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3123

Cited by

Hemphill v. Mississippi State Highway Commission
Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1962
Tanner v. Ervin
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1959
District of Columbia v. Edith Bolling Wilson
D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1954

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

National Metropolitan Bank v. Stoner — freecase.ai