Opinion

Bristow v. Thornton

249 Or. 294 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1968

Full text

BRISTOW v. THORNTON

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — McAllister

PER CURIAM. The appellants, being dissatisfied with the ballot title prepared by the attorney general for an initiative measure filed with the Secretary of State, have appealed. Their argument on appeal is that the title as prepared violates the spirit of OES 254.070. We have carefully examined the ballot title prepared by the attorney general and are of the opinion that the title as prepared is in compliance with the statutes. The attorney general’s ballot title is affirmed.