Full text
Nicholas R. McCARTHY v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY
Opinions in this case
- Opinion
- Majority
PER CURIAM.
There was sufficient evidence to present an issue for the jury in support of plaintiff’s contention that the operator of the electric baggage truck might have chosen a safe path on the other side of the station platform, instead of the course he followed — next the train discharging and receiving passengers. See, e. g., Callaghan v. City of New York, 283 App.Div. 388, 128 N.Y.S.2d 206.
Affirmed.
