Full text
GATES v. HORNING
PER CURIAM.
The issue presented in this appeal is the meaning of the term “transfer” in a confession of judgment executed by defendant and his late wife.
Defendant argues that the deed to his new wife did not constitute a “transfer.” We disagree.
W.T. Rawleigh Co. v. McCoy, 96 Or 474, 190 P 311 (1920); Hammond v. Oregon etc. R.R. Co., 117 Or 244, 243 P 767, cert den 273 US 707.
Affirmed.
