Full text
In the Matter of the Marriage of CONDON, and CONDON
PER CURIAM
The trial court’s holding that defendant was in indirect contempt is not supported by adequate findings. See State ex rel v. Bassett, 166 Or 628, 113 P2d 432, 114 P2d 546 (1941); State ex rel Hiers v. Strain, 56 Or App 402, 642 P2d 315 (1982).
Reversed. Costs to appellant.