Loading…

Sarv K. Nagrath v. Monroe Systems for Business, Incorporated, Stephen Uphill — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Sarv K. Nagrath v. Monroe Systems for Business, Incorporated, Stephen Uphill

65 F.3d 166 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 7, 1995

Full text

Sarv K. Nagrath v. Monroe Systems for Business, Incorporated, Stephen Uphill

65 F.3d 166 Sarv K. Nagrath v. Monroe Systems for Business, Incorporated, Stephen Uphill NO. 94-1934 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. June 07, 1995 — 1 — Appeal From: E.D.Va. — 2 — AFFIRMED.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 703389

Citations

65 F.3d 166
1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30524
1995 WL 361129

Cited by

Blumberg v. Roney
D. Maryland · Jun 3, 2025
Brooks v. Zorn
D. South Carolina · Mar 25, 2025
Fitzer v. Allergan, Inc.
D. Maryland · Jul 9, 2024
Dhruva v. CuriosityStream Inc.
D. Maryland · Jan 17, 2024
Ledergerber v. Blubaugh
D. Maryland · Nov 13, 2023
WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS
M.D. North Carolina · Aug 19, 2021
Smith v. State of Maryland
D. Maryland · Jan 10, 2020
TA Operating LLC v. Comdata, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware · Sep 11, 2017
South Carolina v. United States

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

D. South Carolina · Feb 7, 2017

A.O. Smith Corp. v. Elbi S.P.A.

Fifth Circuit · Feb 22, 2005

Micro Products, Inc. v. Sylvan Learning Systems, Inc.

Fairfax County Circuit Court · Mar 16, 1999

American Microtel, Incorporated v. Sfa, Incorporated, Micromedia Development Services, Incorporated

Fourth Circuit · Jun 7, 1995

Parentheticals

“Rule 15(b) allows parties to amend their pleadings to conform to the evidence presented at trial if the parties expressly or impliedly agreed to try the unpleaded issue.”
WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS