Loading…

Shook v. Haar — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Shook v. Haar

114 Or. App. 638 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 12, 1992

Full text

Joyce A. SHOOK v. Michael VONDER HAAR, and Jane Doe VONDER HAAR

PER CURIAM Reversed. Kintigh v. Elliott, 280 Or 265, 570 P2d 659 (1977).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Edmonds, Riggs, Warren
Cluster ID: 7037275

Citations

114 Or. App. 638
1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1605
834 P.2d 552

Cited by

Shook v. Vonder Haar
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 26, 1995

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service