Loading…

State v. Thomas — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Thomas

136 Or. App. 615 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 1995

Full text

STATE OF OREGON v. RODNEY THOMAS

PER CURIAM Reconsideration allowed; decision vacated; affirmed. State v. Flowers, 136 Or App 555, 902 P2d 624 (1995).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Landau, Leeson, Riggs
Cluster ID: 7039269

Citations

136 Or. App. 615
1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1321
901 P.2d 990

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service