Loading…

King v. Building Supply Discount — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

King v. Building Supply Discount

1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 92 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 17, 1996

Full text

In the Matter of the Compensation of James M. King, James M. KING v. BUILDING SUPPLY DISCOUNT and SAIF Corporation

Opinions in this case

Majority — Per curiam
Majority — Per curiam

PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. King v. Building Supply Discount, 133 Or App 179, 889 P2d 1310 (1995).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Deits, Hasel, Muniz, Ton
Cluster ID: 7039447

Citations

1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 92
138 Or. App. 520
1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 83
138 Or. App. 519
909 P.2d 900
909 P.2d 901

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service