Loading…

State v. Daniel — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Daniel

178 Or. App. 154 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2001

Full text

In the Matter of Stephen Daniel, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON v. STEPHEN DANIEL

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority — Per curiam

PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Buffum, 166 Or App 552, 999 P2d 541, rev allowed 331 Or 361 (2000).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Armstrong, Edmonds, Kistler
Cluster ID: 7041413

Citations

178 Or. App. 154
2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1751
35 P.3d 1106

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service