Loading…

Umphrey v. Doll — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Umphrey v. Doll

188 Or. App. 762 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 2003

Full text

Connie UMPHREY, individually and Clancy Umphrey, a minor, by and through his parent and guardian, Connie Umphrey v. Diane DOLL

PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded. Neff v. Jackson County, 187 Or App 402, 67 P3d 977 (2003).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Deits, Haselton, Wollheim
Cluster ID: 7042024

Citations

188 Or. App. 762
2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 892
72 P.3d 1010

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service