Loading…

State v. Warner — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Warner

211 Or. App. 249 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 28, 2007

Full text

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ROBYN KAY WARNER

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority — Per curiam

PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Vazquez-Escobar, 211 Or App 115, 153 P3d 168 (2007).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Landau, Ortega, Schuman
Cluster ID: 7044758

Citations

211 Or. App. 249
2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 291
154 P.3d 146

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service