Loading…

State v. Rangel — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Rangel

219 Or. App. 427 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 16, 2008

Full text

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent v. PABLO RANGEL

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority — Per curiam

PER CURIAM Petition for reconsideration denied. State v. Dominguez-Coronado, 219 Or App 315, 182 P3d 322 (2008).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Brewer, Edmonds, Sercombe
Cluster ID: 7046071

Citations

219 Or. App. 427
2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 496
182 P.3d 311

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service