Loading…

State v. Brown — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Brown

219 Or. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 30, 2008

Full text

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DANIEL RAY BROWN

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority — Per curiam

PER CURIAM Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. State v. Marshall, 219 Or App 511, 183 P3d 241 (2008).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Brewer, Deits, Schuman, Tempore
Cluster ID: 7046090

Citations

219 Or. App. 545
2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 571
183 P.3d 1051

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service