Loading…

State v. Maddox — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Maddox

226 Or. App. 417 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 4, 2009

Full text

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent v. CHRISTOPHER DORIAN MADDOX

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority — Per curiam

PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Henson, 226 Or App 135, 203 P3d 244 (2009).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Brewer, Haselton, Landau
Cluster ID: 7047039

Citations

226 Or. App. 417
2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 287
203 P.3d 367

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service