Loading…

State v. Day — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Day

227 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 1, 2009

Full text

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DANNY JOE DAY, JR.

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Opinion — Brewer
Majority — Per curiam

PER CURIAM Reversed. State v. Mack, 219 Or App 119, 183 P3d 191, rev den, 345 Or 301 (2008).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Armstrong, Haselton, Rosenblum
Cluster ID: 7047146

Citations

227 Or. App. 1
227 Or. App. 288
2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 190
2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 182
204 P.3d 870
205 P.3d 74

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service