Loading…

State v. Hale — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Hale

2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1098 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 5, 2009

Full text

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent v. RAYMOND HENRY HALE

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority — Per curiam

PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Thomas, 229 Or App 453, 211 P3d 979 (2009).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Deits, Haselton, Rosenblum
Cluster ID: 7047626

Citations

2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1098
230 Or. App. 246
213 P.3d 869

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service