Loading…

State v. Prudencio-Rios — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Prudencio-Rios

2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 58 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 27, 2010

Full text

STATE OF OREGON v. ANDRES PRUDENCIO-RIOS, Defendant-Respondent

PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Anderson, 231 Or App 198, 217 P3d 1133 (2009).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Edmonds, Sercombe, Wollheim
Cluster ID: 7048046

Citations

2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 58
233 Or. App. 472
225 P.3d 148

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service