Loading…

State v. Pauling — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Pauling

248 Or. App. 753 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 14, 2012

Full text

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent v. KENDALL KIRK PAULING

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority — Per curiam

PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Leino, 248 Or App 121, 273 P3d 228 (2012).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Armstrong, Duncan, Haselton
Cluster ID: 7049924

Citations

248 Or. App. 753
2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 260
273 P.3d 369
2012 WL 837383

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service